Legal Issues Associated with the Use of Probabilistic Design Methods

Standard [CURRENT]

SAE AIR 5113:2002-06-07

Legal Issues Associated with the Use of Probabilistic Design Methods

Publication date
2002-06-07
Original language
English
Pages
94

198.00 EUR VAT included

185.05 EUR VAT excluded

Format and language options

PDF download
  • 198.00 EUR

Shipment (3-5 working days)
  • 198.00 EUR

Monitor with the Standards Ticker

This option is only available after login.
Easily subscribe: Save time and money now!

You can also subscribe to this document - together with other important standards in your industry. This makes your work easier and pays for itself after a short time.

Sparschwein_data
Subscription advantages
Sparschwein Vorteil 1_data

Important standards for your industry, regularly updated

Sparschwein Vorteil 2_data

Much cheaper than buying individually

Sparschwein Vorteil 3_data

Useful functions: Filters, version comparison and more

Publication date
2002-06-07
Original language
English
Pages
94
Loading recommended items...

Quick delivery via download or delivery service

Buy securely with a credit card or pay upon receipt of invoice

All transactions are encrypted

Short description

This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) addresses legal issues concerning use of non-deterministic methods in the design and/or analysis of systems. The investigation includes an assessment of legal precedent for use of these methods both in the aerospace industry and in other non-aerospace engineering contexts. The investigation is primarily, but not exclusively, focused on United States of America Federal and State Law. This document is not intended to be used in any way as a "legal justification" for the use of Probabilistic Methods - it is simply a compilation of experience and past precedent. Many engineers note that the use of Probabilistic Methods for failure risk assessment implies an acceptance that any design will have a finite, albeit small, risk of loss of function, and express concern that this could be seized upon in a Court of Law to indicate that the design was "unsafe". This report helps to allay some of these fears by presenting the logic used in past legal determinations to assess liability following loss of function of artifacts designed using both deterministic and probabilistic engineering methods. Some recommendations are also provided in the report of "good practice" to be followed when using non-deterministic design methods - most of which are equally applicable to deterministic design methods.
Loading recommended items...